Our algorithms for 21st century publishing learn from the interconnected world's vast database of information, user behavior and trends.
The increasing number of organizations and people contributing to the Internet, either deliberately or incidentally, has created a huge set of data that gives us millions of potential insights into product advancements, user experience, marketing, trends, and human behavior in general. This is creating an emerging field of collective intelligence.
We are harnessing that power to help advance our industry. We are now in position to-do today - much more than what we could accomplish with only the trade journals and trade shows of the past.

What Is Collective Intelligence?
People have used the phrase collective intelligence for decades, and it has become increasingly popular and more important with the advent of new communications technologies. Although the expression may bring to mind ideas of group consciousness or supernatural phenomena, when technologists use this phrase they usually mean the combining of behavior, preferences, or ideas of a group of people to create novel insights.
Collective intelligence was, of course, possible before the Internet. You don’t need the Web to collect data from disparate groups of people, combine it, and analyze it.One of the most basic forms of this is a survey or census. Collecting answers from a large group of people lets you draw statistical conclusions about the group that no individual member would have known by themselves. Building new conclusions from independent contributors is really what collective intelligence is all about.
A well-known example is financial markets, where a price is not set by one individual or by a coordinated effort, but by the trading behavior of many independent people all acting in what they believe is their own best interest. Although it seems counter-intuitive at first, futures markets, in which many participants trade contracts based on their beliefs about future prices, are considered to be better at predicting prices than experts who independently make projections. This is because these markets combine the knowledge, experience, and insight of thousands of people to create a projection rather than relying on a single person’s perspective.
Although methods for collective intelligence existed before the Internet, the ability to collect information from thousands or even millions of people on the Web has opened up many new possibilities. At all times, people are using the Internet for purchases, research, entertainment, and just about everything. All of this behavior can be monitored and used to derive information without ever having to interrupt the user’s intentions by asking him questions. There are a huge number of ways this information can be processed and interpreted.
Here are a couple of key examples that show the contrasting approaches:
• Wikipedia is an online encyclopedia created entirely from user contributions. Any page can be created or edited by anyone, and there are a small number of administrators who monitor repeated abuses. Wikipedia has more entries than any other encyclopedia, and despite some manipulation by malicious users, it is generally believed to be accurate on most subjects.
This is an example of collective intelligence because each article is maintained by a large group of people and the result is an encyclopedia far larger than any single coordinated group has been able to create. The Wikipedia software does not do anything particularly intelligent with user contributions—it simply tracks the changes and displays the latest version.
• Google is the world’s most popular Internet search engine, and was the first search engine to rate web pages based on how many other pages link to them. This method of rating takes information about what thousands of people have said about a particular web page and uses that information to rank the results in a search. This is a very different example of collective intelligence.
Where Wikipedia explicitly invites users of the site to contribute, Google extracts the important information from what web-content creators do on their own sites and uses it to generate scores for its users. While Wikipedia is a great resource and an impressive example of collective intelligence, it owes its existence much more to the user base that contributes information than it does to clever algorithms in the software.
In both cases, the important thing is not just to collect and display the information, but to process it in an intelligent way and generate new information.