Industry News - Offshore Engineer Reports - Seismic on demand for BP’s born-again Valhall fieldSeismic on demand for BP’s born-again Valhall field from: Offshore Engineer by: Andrew McBarnet Friday, July 11, 2003

BP is scoring a world first with its decision to install a permanent 4D seismic cable acquisition
system on its Valhall field, offshore Norway. Details of the so called Life of Field Seismic (LoFS)
project were released at the EAGE annual gathering in Stavanger last month and immediately
became the show’s hottest topic. OE seismics editor Andrew McBarnet reports on this and
other highlights at Europe’s premier event for the geoscience community.
You can’t accuse BP of not doing its
best to maximize production from
the Valhall field in the Norwegian
North Sea. The field was discovered in 1975
by Amoco (pre-merger) and came into
production in 1982. At that time the
expected recovery rate was 14%. Today,
thanks to around NKr10 billion invested in
new projects including a new water
injection platform due to be installed
sometime very soon and two flank
wellhead platforms from which over 30
new wells will be drilled, the recovery
factor has risen to 40%.
In crude terms, BP with partners
Amerada Hess, Shell and Total are now
looking forward to the field, currently
producing at around 80,000 b/d, continuing
in production until at least 2028. At the
beginning of this year Valhall had
produced 471 million stb of oil, on the way
to a newly set target of 1050 million stb of
oil by 2028, and who knows, maybe more.
Arguably the most keenly anticipated
technology being deployed on Valhall is
the NKr350 million LoFS permanent 4D
seismic installation, details of which were
made known at last month’s European
Association of Geoscientists and
Engineers (EAGE) annual conference and
exhibition in Stavanger. For a hard-pressed
geophysical services industry scrambling
to survive shrinking demand for
traditional seismic survey work, LoFS
offers the prospect of an emerging
reservoir management market in which
BP has been something of a pioneer.
The company began experimenting with
permanent 4D seismic in the late 1990s on
the Foinaven field, west of Shetland. On
Valhall, BP intends to bury in the seabed
more than 120km of specially developed
multi-component seismic cable covering
35km2 around the producing reservoirs.
Cable trenching operations by Halliburton
company Subsea 7 began early last month
and were expected to last seven weeks, in
time for the first data acquisition
programme in late August. The cable array
design comes from OYO Geospace,
following a two year R&D programme, and
is made up of thousands of four
component sensors (three geophones and
one hydrophone) embedded in the cable.
This configuration is vital. Hydrophones,
used in conventional marine seismic towed
streamer applications, only measure the
pressure (p) waves of reflected seismic.
The addition of geophones, effective on the
seabed or on land, can measure shear (s)
waves. In this case the s-waves should
allow BP to ‘see’ through the Valhall gas
cap, which would otherwise be a serious
obstruction to seismic imaging.
The network of cables being laid will be
connected by an umbilical to the main
Valhall platform facility. From there, the
seismic data acquired during shooting
over the reservoir, as much as seven
terabytes, will be transferred by fibre optic
cable to shore for processing by Petroleum
Geo-Services (PGS) based in BP’s offices in
Stavanger but making use of its major
processing centres in Oslo and Houston.
BP says that the application of LoFS on
Valhall could mean an increase in
production of as much as 60 million
barrels. The expectation comes from the
perceived benefits of repeated 3D seismic
imaging over the same location, if the
surveys can be accurately repeated. BP is
planning six surveys over 18 months,
which is probably over-cooking the egg,
but the company is understandably keen to
see if the system works. It means, for
example, that PGS will have to deliver
processed data in 30-60 days, the quick
turnaround providing BP with a totally
new form of near real-time reservoir
management.
Success of what is being called ‘seismic
on demand’ will be measured by whether
the company’s multi-disciplinary teams
onshore can quickly discern changes in
the behaviour of the Valhall reservoir,
particularly the movement of hydrocarbon
fluids, by comparing images from the
different seismic surveys carried out over
time. In the best scenario, the data will
point the way to better informed reservoir
production decisions, not to mention fewer
dry holes. Although at this stage uncertain
of the outcome of its investment in LoFS,
BP is hoping that it will be able to apply
the technology to other fields, either
already in production or from the word go
to a new field development. The industry
as a whole will be watching closely,
because the potential upside is huge in
terms of increased output from existing
reservoirs.
From a technical standpoint, the key to
LoFS and, for that matter, all 3D time-lapse
(4D) operations is repeatability. Operators
need to be sure that the conditions of each
survey are as similar as possible. By
permanently burying the seismic
recording equipment, a major element of
the positioning equation is removed
compared with a towed streamer repeat
survey operation where wind, tide, and
survey geometry all complicate precise
repetition. The main concern about buried
cable is the durability of the sensor
recording equipment over time, which is
why OYO Geospace has built considerable
redundancy into the system.
This leaves the accurate shooting of each
survey as the main variable and potential
headache for the LoFS technology. With no
towed streamers to worry about, BP intends
to use a suitably equipped standby vessel to
shoot each survey on the Valhall field. It is
contracting Scottish company Concept
Systems, an acknowledged expert in
seismic navigation and positioning, to come
up with a fast-track solution to the problem
of positioning, QC control and data
management to ensure that the shooting of
each survey is the same.
A complication is that the amount of data
generated by multicomponent recording is
much greater than conventional marine
seismic, and data handling is more
complex. Concept is expected to adapt its
existing technology offerings, which have
already been deployed in ocean bottom
cable multi-component surveys where data
management and operation control are
issues (OE March 2000). BP is said to be
looking for a high degree of automation to
both improve repeatability and reduce
costs.
The full list of BP’s technology partners
on the LoFS project also includes Bolt
(generation of seismic sources), Facilium
(project engineering, procurement and
management services), Fugro (vessel and
source positioning), Input/Ouput (digital
source control system), Rovde (vessel
provider and marine operator), and
Westland Projects (source handling and
vessel engineering).
Ottesen cuts to the chase
King Harold V of Norway, the Minister of
Oil and Energy Einar Steensnæs and
the CEO of Statoil Olav Fjell all took a
stab at it in their opening speeches to the
EAGE meeting in Stavanger last month. But
it was David Ottesen, senior vice president,
eastern hemisphere operations, Baker
Hughes Inteq, who got closest to
addressing the theme of the event –
Geoscience and its role in society – and it
was something of a wake-up call not just for
the geoscience community but for the E&P
industry in general.
Ottesen took no hostages in
pointing out, among other things, that the
industry’s human capital is ageing and not
being replaced, that R&D spending in the
industry has got completely out of whack,
and that attempts to
‘commoditize’ advanced
technology will be selfdefeating.
The facts of life were,
according to Ottesen,
that 96% of the world
population increase now
occurs in the developing
regions of Africa, Asia and
Latin America, and this
percentage will rise over
the next 25 years. Over
the same 25 years, the
world’s population of
people aged 65 and older
will more than double.
‘Since the early 1980s
the number of people employed in our
industry has fallen by 50%’ he said, ‘and it
continues to fall. And we still struggle with
recruitment!’
The kicker, in his view, was that the
average age of the industry’s workforce is
advancing each year. In the mid-80s the
average age of G&G personnel was 32,
today it is 50. To replenish the world’s
energy resources over the next 25 years,
Ottesen said that industry will have to
replenish and diversify its human resources
by recruiting from the growing young
populations of developing countries where,
by 2025, the average age will be 30
compared with 45 in developed countries.
The last 10 years have also seen a major
shift in R&D spending. Operators have
dropped their spend by nearly $2 billion over
the last decade while service companies
have more than doubled their investment in
R&D over the same time period. Ten years
ago the total was nearly $4 billion, today it
is less then $3 billion. If the trend
continues, Ottesen predicted that service
companies may soon own 50% of the
combined R&D investment dollars and the
total may well fall short of what the world
will need to support its growing energy
needs.
Nor is investment in advanced technology
a guarantee of success. Ottesen noted that
the return on 3D seismic technology fell far
below expectations to the point where
companies could no longer afford to stay in
business. Maybe capacity was overbuilt in a
very capital-intensive business, he
admitted, and maybe the technology was
applied when it didn’t provide incremental
value. But this did not excuse the trend set
by oil companies out to cut their short-term
cost at the expense of the long-term value
of 3D seismic. Ottesen said they had
contributed in a major way to the current
dire state of the seismic marketplace.
He also expressed alarm at a similar drive
in the industry to commoditize all elements
of oilfield services without regard to the
value new technology and innovative
processes will deliver. Lower prices are easy
for most of us to understand, he said, as
should be the value of performance and
innovation. ‘All sorts of
methods are being applied
to price, but none to
value: the reverse auction
is the most recent
method, the primary
effect of which is to lower
price on all deliverables
regardless of value . . . It
is easy to measure the
size of the invoice for any
given well, what is much
more difficult is to assess
the value the well
ultimately produces.
Today’s short-term focus
comes with the
assumption that the long
term will take care of itself. Believe me, it
will not.’
For service companies to survive under
the commodity scenario, their focus will
naturally shift from creating value through
new technology for their customers to
efficient delivery of low cost, baseline
technology faster and more efficiently.
Ottesen warned that the majority of the
remaining oil reserves, especially in mature
markets like the United States and the
North Sea, could not be recovered
efficiently using today’s baseline
technology.
If the industry continued to commoditize
new technology and ignore the value it
adds, Ottesen said there will be no more
success stories like Troll, which would not
have happened had the market environment
and procurement methodology of today
existed back in the mid-90s.
‘Producers are expecting increased
recovery and the service industry can help
achieve it,’ he concluded, ‘but it will require
cooperation and focus on the creation of
value.’ Without this, even Norway will
realize significantly less then the NKr2000
billion it is hoping for in future revenues,
and the majority of hydrocarbons will stay in
the ground. OE
|