Industry News - Offshore Engineer Reports - Spotting those spillsSpotting those spills from: Offshore Engineer by: Terry Knott Wednesday, May 11, 2005
Detecting the release of oil to the sea from offshore installations or ships on a
continuous basis is no easy task. But now a new technique has emerged that
promises to identify and report oil spills as they occur, as Terry Knott reports.
Ask any operator of an offshore
installation or the owner of a
shipping line if there are sufficient
international protocols and national
regulations for restricting the discharge of
oil to the sea, and they'll almost certainly
answer yes. But despite widespread rules
preventing oily wastes being discharged,
or others which specify onboard cleanup
before doing so - plus mandatory reporting
systems - oil spills still occur; often by
accident, sometimes not.
'While preventative measures have been
taken worldwide to reduce oil being
released into the marine environment,'
says Casper Kvitzau of online
environmental surveillance specialist
OSIS International in Denmark, 'it is
estimated that more than 500,000t of oil are
spilled into the sea every year. But success
in identifying the precise sources of the oil
spills is not that great.'
By way of example, he points to the
'Special Areas' designated by the United
Nations' International Maritime
Organisation (IMO) under Annex 1 to the
Marpol 73/78 protocol, to protect sensitive
marine environments from ship
discharges - the protocol has so far been
ratified for the Mediterranean, Black Sea,
Red Sea, Gulf of Oman, Gulf of Aden, the
Arabian Gulf region, Antarctic, Baltic and
northwest European waters. While the
Marpol protocol does not specifically cover
offshore structures, national and regional
regulations, for example the Ospar
Convention covering the North East
Atlantic, do focus on discharges from the
offshore industry.
'The present strategy for detecting oil
pollution in sensitive areas relies heavily
on aerial surveillance,' he notes. 'The local
authorities make regular surveillance
flights but their resources are very
stretched, so they tend to focus on, say, just
the main shipping lanes. Or they may
purchase satellite images, but these are
really snapshots in time, not round the
clock, and don't always prove who
discharged the oil. With thousands of ship
movements and hundreds of offshore
platforms in these regions, aerial
surveillance cannot hope to spot all
releases of oil. Offenders are rarely caught
in the act and brought to prosecution.'
In a report published in 2002 by the
National Research Council of the US
National Academy of Sciences, the average
total worldwide annual release of oil from
all known sources to the sea was estimated
at 1.3 million tonnes - arising from a wide
range, possibly 470,000t to 8.4 million
tonnes per year. According to the report,
while natural oil seeps accounted for 46%
of the oil, among the other principal
sources, operational discharges from ships
and discharges from land-based sources
produced 37%, accidental spills from ships
12%, and 'extraction of oil' - the offshore
industry - only 3%.
While the offshore industry might take
some comfort in its relatively small
contribution to the overall problem,
Kvitzau points out that offshore platforms
are currently exempt from the Special
Areas protocol, which requires oil
discharge levels to be below 15ppm for
vessels under 400t, and no discharges from
larger vessels. Under Ospar, the current
requirement for platform discharges is
40ppm, with a recommendation that this
be reduced to 30ppm in 2006.
'Ospar produced an action plan in the
late 1990s which called for the development
of best available techniques and best
environmental practices for the control of
oil and other substances in aqueous
discharges from offshore installations,'
says Kvitzau. 'The drive is toward
harmonising the IMO and Ospar
regulations so that platforms will also be
more restricted in the discharge of oil.
This will require more effective
monitoring of oil emissions from offshore
structures,' he observes.
Driven by the need for better
surveillance, the OSIS project was set in
motion five years ago to develop and
demonstrate a sensor system, mounted
directly on offshore platforms that would
perform 24-hour surveillance in checking
for oil spills. The prototype of that system
has recently completed offshore trials.
Funded by the Danish Environmental
Protection Agency, Danish Energy
Authority and the European Union, the
development by OSIS International of
OSIS - oil spill identification sensor - has
been targeted at delivering a system which
can detect oil spills round the clock,
estimate the area of a spill and its
thickness, and relay this information to
onshore authorities in real time.
The prototype platform-mounted sensor
at the heart of the system is packaged in a
fibre glass and aluminum pod, and is
driven by an electric motor so that it
rotates to sweep the area around the
installation - the prototype is 1.65m high
and 1.5m in diameter, weighing 460kg,
although a commercial version would be
smaller, says the company.
Contained within the unit are two
primary sensing systems. One is radar,
which, with the help of rule-based pattern
recognition software built into the device,
can detect the presence of an oil spill on
the surface of the sea. The detection range
stretches over several kilometers and the
system calculates the area of the spill.
The second sensor is a microwave
radiometer. This measures 'brightness
temperature', a measure of the intensity
of radiation thermally emitted by an
object.
'Bodies such as water or oil emit
microwave radiation,' explains Jesper
Holst, technical manager for OSIS
International. 'Furthermore all bodies
reflect and absorb a portion of the
equivalent microwave radiation from
other bodies in the area. In this case those
other bodies may be clouds or ships, for
example. In addition, microwave radiation
from space also strikes the bodies and is
reflected. The OSIS sensor detects all of
these very small and complex signals and
makes allowance for them in the analysis
algorithm. OSIS can not only distinguish
between oil and water from their relative
brightness temperatures, but sophisticated
software algorithms can also provide a
measure of the thickness of the oil, from
0.2mm to 2mm thick.'
Data collected by the OSIS sensor pack is
analysed in a master unit located offshore
and transmitted via satellite to a central
server onshore, which can collect data
from sensors at multiple sites around the
world - data transmission costs are kept
down by only sending information if an oil
spill occurs. Automated decision-making
software in the central server converts the
sensor data into oil spill information,
displaying the result graphically on the
users' computer screens, for example
within regulatory bodies and offshore
operating companies.
'Users registered on the OSIS central
server will have access to predefined
surveillance areas, displayed on the OSIS
viewer,' explains Kvitzau, co-ordinator of
the project for OSIS International. 'The
viewer (see illustrations)
enables the user to navigate easily between
a general overview of the surveillance
area and the specific readings of the
selected sensor. In the case of an oil spill,
the system provides the user with spill
location, distances and oil volume
estimates, which will help plan cleanup
operations.'
One scenario for offshore
applications envisages sensor
packs located on several platforms
in a region
transmitting data by
wireless ethernet to a local
master unit, which then
links to the satellite and
central server.
The master unit enables
up to 16 sensor packs to
communicate through a
single satellite channel.
The OSIS prototype
was built in 2003, and has
since been certified by
DNV for offshore and
marine applications, with
patents pending in the US and
Europe. In collaboration with the
Danish navy in 2003, OSIS was used
in a trial to detect a rape seed oil spill at
the naval harbour at Korsør in Denmark,
and subsequently calibrated onshore in
the first quarter of 2004. An offshore test
programme began in May 2004 for which
OSIS was initially mounted onboard the
Danish environmental vessel Gunnar
Seidenfaden, again detecting spills of rape
seed oil, trials which yielded important
data for optimising the software
algorithms. The sensor was then moved to
jackup rig Ensco 70, drilling under contract
with operator DONG on the Nini and Sofie
fields in the Danish sector. The trials,
which concluded in March this year, are
reported to have been very successful,
providing the data needed to finalise the
design of a commercial sensor pack.
'OSIS demonstrated it could provide 24
hour surveillance and maintain its
accuracy in wind speeds up to 15m/s and
wave heights around 10m,' says Kvitzau.
'Oil spill thickness was accurately detected
up to 1.5mm, but we can take this further
by applying different frequency bands in
the radiometer - the prototype has only
one frequency band. But even having a
measurement up to 1.5mm gives you an
idea of the minimum amount of oil you
would have to deal with in a spill cleanup.'
Fitted to a vessel, OSIS could also be
used in 'forward looking' mode in cleanup
operations.
The company believes that once the
surveillance technique is established, its
inclusion on a platform could help lower
insurance costs for the operator, and in
future, operators having a 'positive
environmental profile' resulting from the
routine use of OSIS might influence their
selection for exploration in sensitive
marine areas.
OSIS International is now beginning
work on a version of the system tailored
for use on ships. In these applications,
OSIS will be designed to interface with the
Universal Automatic Identification
Systems (UAIS), required by the IMO to be
fitted to all vessels over 300t from the end
of 2004 to help track vessels by satellite and
avoid collisions.
In operation, OSIS would normally
transmit an 'all clear' signal along with the
regular UAIS transmission. Should an oil
spill be observed by OSIS, the data will
automatically be sent via satellite to the
central server onshore, as in the case of
offshore installations. OE
Click here to register to receive your own copy of Offshore Engineer each month.
|