Industry News - Offshore Engineer Reports - Deepwater dreamsDeepwater dreams from: Offshore Engineer by: Marshall DeLuca Wednesday, October 26, 2005
Despite mounting internal and external pressures, Mexico is
not likely to open its doors to foreign investment in offshore
production any time soon. Marshall DeLuca reviews the
current state of a market that continues to stay hot for some
but untouchable for others.
In Mexico, like most nations whose
economies are driven chiefly by oil
production, times are good. Oil prices
are at an all time high, the nation's oil
production has reached record levels, and
the impending decline the populace has
been warned about for years has yet to
occur. But as state oil company Pemex
knows, though it is tough to imagine and
even more difficult to convince the
public, the writing is on the wall and it
reads these good times won't last for long.
The problems begin, says analysts
Wood Mackenzie, with the fact that while
Mexican oil production may be at an all
time high, it is also at its peak and within
the next two to three years decline will
begin. The chief culprit behind this
demise is the mainstay of the country's
supply for the past 25 years, the giant
Cantarell field located in the Bay of
Campeche.
This field, which ranks as the world's
second largest, provides more than 60%
of the country's oil at a rate of over two
million b/d. But this rate is expected fall
to about half that level by 2008 leaving a
gaping hole that will need to be filled.
In response, Pemex expects to add
around 800,000b/d of oil from the
Ku-Maloob-Zaap project and another
250,000b/d from the 18-field Litoral de
Tabasco plan by the end of the decade (see
Feature Picking up Cantarell's slack).
But according to WoodMac's production
forecast, which takes these projects into
account, they will be insufficient to
counteract the decline of Cantarell.
'Pemex recognizes the problems that
Mexico has and the potential problems
coming up in the next few years,' explains
Matthew Shaw, WoodMac senior Latin
America analyst. 'There are a few other
developments that might enable the
country to maintain production for a
little bit.'
However the bigger problem, he adds, is
that there are no big new discoveries out
there waiting to be developed, though
there is an easy answer.
Deepwater holdings
The key to Mexico's future, says nearly
everyone, is the deepwater. Last August,
Pemex CEO Luis Ramirez Corzo, who was
then E&P director, said following a threeyear
$4.55 billion exploration campaign,
the country's deepwater, based on a
conservative estimate, holds untapped
reserves in the range of 45 billion barrels,
four-fifths of which remains unexplored.
'All the indications are that the
deepwater is very prospective,' agrees
Shaw. 'There are not many untouched
basins around the world. In fact I can't
think of any untouched basins around
the world, with such high potential that
remain unexplored. Add that to the fact
that it is on the doorstep to the US, it is a
very stable political country with a long
history and good international relations,
and you can understand why oil
companies would love to be able to access
that basin.'
But here again, Mexico runs into
problems. While Pemex would love
nothing better than to tap these reserves,
it has very publicly admitted that it
possesses neither the capital nor the
technological expertise to do so in
deepwater. The company has said it plans
to invest $15 billion a year for the next 15
years to gain this knowledge, but several
outsiders doubt this would be enough,
including ExxonMobil exploration
president Tim Cejka who felt it would
take 40 years and cost upwards of $250
billion.
Political roadblock
On the other hand, foreign companies
with this capital and know-how would
like nothing better than to help Mexico
access these reserves in return for a
share in the production. However,
according to the Mexican constitution,
foreign ownership of the country's
reserves is forbidden.
'If Pemex is going to bring in private
companies, the only way constitutionally
they can do that is through service
contracts,' adds Shaw. 'But under these
service contracts the contractor cannot
actually have its profits tied to oil or gas
production.
'Now if you are Shell, BP or Exxon, do
you want to get paid for just drilling some
wells?
'What they need are reserves to book,
produce those reserves and get the upside
from them. So you have a kind of
fundamental stumbling block. It is no
one's fault; it is just the way the
constitution is written at the moment.'
While there is a growing initiative
supported by Pemex senior management
to reform these protectionist clauses in
the constitution, Shaw and most other
industry observers feel change any time
soon is not likely, especially given the
'good times'.
'The writing is not yet on the wall
except for those within Pemex who have
been forced to look three or four years
down the road,' he says. 'It's hard to see
things changing rapidly in Mexico. Those
within Pemex and those within the
government who do see the problem
coming are getting more and more vocal
and more and more practiced in their
arguments and maybe they can change
public and political opinion, but nobody I
know is expecting a quick change.'
Another catalyst that could swing the
vote decisively one way or the other is the
presidential election to be held next year
with the victor taking office in January
2007.
'Whoever is the president at that point
will set the scene for the direction that
Mexican energy reform goes for the next
five or six years after 2007,' Shaw says.
'That is going to be the crunch time
because very soon after that person takes
office, oil production is going to start
going down and who knows what might
happen to oil prices. So very quickly into
that new presidency, there may be some
bad news beginning to hit Mexico.'
At the moment, the current
frontrunner is the former mayor of
Mexico City who has publicly opposed
any privatization of the energy sector.
Still trying
But Pemex is not sitting idly by. The
company has been working to establish
some sort of service contract to entice
foreign participation in the deepwater
without breach of law and expects to have
something to offer the industry as early
as next year, though Shaw feels that it
will likely be very unattractive.
The company is also actively trying its
hand in deepwater and remains positive.
Late last year the company drilled its
first deepwater discovery, Nab-1, located
in 2200ft of water and thought to hold
between 100 million and 200 million
barrels of heavy oil and plans are on the
books to drill another eight to ten
deepwater wells in the next two years.
'We have experience, but not in the
deepwater so we will need help from
service companies and others to gain that
knowledge,' says engineer Ricardo
Palomo Martinez, Pemex E&P subdirector
of the drilling unit and well
maintenance for the southwestern
marine region. 'But we will do it.' OE
Click here to register to receive your own copy of Offshore Engineer each month.
|