Industry News - Offshore Engineer Reports - Gibson's paradigm for the futureGibson's paradigm for the future from: Offshore Engineer by: Andrew McBarnet Monday, March 13, 2006
Serious geoscience research is the future, according to John W Gibson Jr,
recently appointed boss of Paradigm, the E&P software company. That's
just one of the topics he discussed with Andrew McBarnet in this profile.
The irrepressible John Gibson is not
one to dodge a question, and so it
proves when asked about his
unexpected departure from Halliburton
and re-emergence as executive chairman
of Paradigm, the geoscience software and
services company. 'I was ready for more of
a leadership role,' he says, 'but this wasn't
going to happen in the timeframe I had in
mind, so it was time to move on.'
Gibson had looked headed for the top at
Halliburton. He was only in his mid-40s
when appointed COO and president of
Halliburton Energy Services group. In 2004
that meant being responsible for nearly
$8 billion of revenue and 37,000 employees.
According to the official CV, Gibson drove
a 98% improvement in Halliburton's
worldwide energy related operations over
a two year period, with operating income
increasing from $638 million in 2002 to
$1266 million in 2004.
He gives every impression of being
enthusiastic about life after Halliburton.
'The reason I joined Paradigm was because
I believed the next decade is going to be
focused on a deep dive back into technology
and research. The future lies in rapid
commercialisation of quality research, not
the delivery of commodity products, and to
my mind Paradigm offers a tremendous
platform as a research company.'
Paradigm has been around in the E&P
business in one form or another since the
1980s, and in the early days had a
computer-aided software offering for 3D
seismic interpretation which competed
with early market leader Landmark
Graphics, the company Gibson joined in
1994, two years before its takeover by
Halliburton.
After various corporate incarnations
Paradigm really came to notice in the
mid-1990s with its GeoDepth product, a
pioneering seismic software interpretation
system focusing on the depth domain.
What transformed the company from
being essentially a niche player was a
series of acquisitions initiated in 1997 by
the purchase of CogniSeis, a seismic data
interpretation and visualisation specialist
with a significant international customer
base for its leading products. Stars of the
collection were the Focus data processing
system, GeoSec geomodelling package, and
VoxelGeo, one of the few proven
volume-based interpretation and
visualisation systems.
Fuelled by new finance from a launch on
the New York Nasdaq in 1998, Paradigm
went on to build a comprehensive suite of
offerings across the full oilfield lifecycle. It
bought Geolog well information tools from
the Australian Petroleum Technology
division of Minicom (PTM), Stratimagic
and IntegralPlus reservoir and
characterisation products from CGG, and
the Sysdrill well planning software
company.
By 2002 Paradigm had built a serious set
of software solutions and integrated
geophysical services for prospect
generation and evaluation supporting
every stage of the E&P process. This was
when its underlying value was spotted by
Fox Paine & Co, a California-based private
equity firm. Fox Paine paid $100 million
for Paradigm and took it private. The
existing management was basically left
intact until last year when Gibson was
recruited to run the company as part of a
deal where he is also very much involved
in Fox Paine's wider investment business
as executive managing director.
Gibson understands Fox Paine's strategy.
'Paradigm is a company with the ability to
make a difference, it has more value than
anything else I could identify in oil and gas.
We have the potential to breakthrough with
new algorithms or methods that can
change the daily production decline rates
around the world.'
The parallels with Gibson's earlier
experience with Landmark are
inescapable. He joined in 1994 after what
can only be described as an unconventional
career path, reflecting a relentlessly
inquisitive mind. The life history includes
dropping out of agricultural college in
Georgia and three formative years in the
US Army before he finally made it to
business school at Auburn University,
Alabama. He actually wanted to study
oceanography but ended up graduating in
geology. His marks were impressive enough
to earn him a job at Gulf Oil, where
characteristically evenings were spent
studying for a master's degree. Gulf
morphed into Chevron and Gibson
gravitated to his real passion, R&D, at La
Hubra, California. From there it was a
short leap to Landmark.
Like Paradigm, the 1990s was a period of
growth by acquisition for Landmark in the
E&P software market. By the time
Halliburton bought Landmark in 1996,
Gibson was number two in the company to
Bob Peebler (now CEO of Input/Output).
He was soon in charge at Landmark before
being elevated to the higher echelons of
the Halliburton corporate empire.
Gibson recognizes that today Paradigm
trails Landmark and Schlumberger in the
big league of E&P software, but is not
overly concerned. 'It's not an appropriate
vision for us,' he says. 'We want to be a
product development company.We don't
have the resources or desire to be a full
service company carrying out the work for
the customer, although of course we
provide high quality support for our
products. Our goal is to deliver the first
rocks and fluid interpretation system, and
that's something the industry doesn't have
at this point.'
Right now the strengths differentiating
Paradigm in the marketplace, according to
Gibson, belong in the signal processing
area and petrophysics. 'We are the leader
in spatial positioning of seismic attributes
and the absolute gorilla as far as
petrophysics is concerned.We tie in the
macro data represented by seismic with
the micro data from the borehole.' He sees
tremendous potential for this combination
as the application of 4D seismic
techniques really take off in the industry,
although he acknowledges that progress in
that direction has been slow. '4D work still
only makes up 5-6% of the overall market.
But we think we can push the curve
forward for our industry. Our reservoir
characterisation and monitoring research
and expertise particularly in the preplanning
of 4D can help to optimize the
repeatability of time-lapse surveys and
allow companies to accurately track the
fluid flow.'
Gibson alleges he doesn't really know
how his company is doing against the
competition in terms of market share, for
the very good reason that he never tries to
estimate it! 'If you do it yourself you bias
the result in one way or another. My
impression is that products such as
Geolog, Focus and VoxelGeo are market
leaders. If our competitors disagree, then
that means we must be pretty close!'
He does have a feeling that Paradigm in
recent years may have confused the market
by the emphasis which was put on its
middleware integration product pos, even
though it was genuinely innovative when
introduced. He would prefer individual
products and the comprehensive offering
they represent to speak for themselves, so
a shift in marketing strategy can be
expected. Right now he's not quibbling too
much since the company has just notched
up its best ever quarter in software sales.
However, the company's performance in
the US is still below expectations. 'The
truth,' he says, 'is that we're a truly
international company geared towards
complex reservoir issues and high end
research. Up to now our clients in the US
have tended to be the big international
companies, rather than the small
independents.'
Paradigm is actually headquartered in
The Netherlands, and has its main
research centres in Russia, Australia,
Canada and the US. There is still a cadre of
scientists in Israel where the company
originated in the 1980s. Since he arrived
last year, one of Gibson's priorities has
been to shift the company's operations to
where the customers are, and he asserts
that the company is more genuinely
international than the competition.
Surprisingly Gibson is finding Paradigm
more of a challenge than Halliburton in
some important respects. 'I had thought
the differences between a multi-billion and
a hundred million company would be
dramatic. But because of our international
footprint, we are working in many of the
same countries with less infrastructure,
which makes this a more difficult job.
Everything is more hands on, which is
exciting but tougher.'
He believes that the experience can
teach him some things which will improve
his performance as a CEO in future. He
cites the example of meetings at
Halliburton where financial decisions
were on the agenda. 'A lot of
considerations would be presented, and
whilst having an awareness of what was
being said, I couldn't claim to have an
in-depth knowledge of how it all worked.
In the future I want to be able to scrutinise
any recommendation with the knowledge
and understanding of a CFO. By extension,
the ideal CFO of the future should also
have operational experience.'
Working with his colleagues at
Paradigm's parent company Fox Paine has
certainly opened Gibson's eyes. Formed in
1997 by Saul A Fox and W Dexter Paine, the
company funds in excess of $1.6 billion
(about to increase by another $1 billion) on
behalf of over 50 leading financial
institutions. It's a very partner oriented
firm, according to Gibson. 'These guys
work with a completely different mindset
when considering an acquisition
compared with the kind of vertical
company I'm used to, so it's an opportunity
to improve my skills in finance.'
As far as funding goes, substantial
backing for acquisitions by Paradigm is
available when required. But money is not
the issue. Gibson says it's more a matter of
finding a product line that complements
what the company already does or
identifying an area where it wants to
expand. 'At the moment,' he confides, 'I am
just excited by our core business.'
One of his current concerns is just
where Paradigm is going to recruit
suitably qualified staff to grow the
business. 'It is a serious challenge for
geoscience-related companies to find the
right talent.We need scientists who are
more highly trained and the education
system is not coming through for us. To be
a next generation geologist, you must
possess strong mathematical skills.
Geology curriculums need to increase the
mathematics requirements.'
Gibson recently expounded in print on
this topic pleading the cause of
'geomathematics' as a preparation for
geostatistics, in his view one of the most
under-valued and under-utilised tools in
the E&P software repertoire. His starting
point was the anecdotal observation that
reviewers of geostatistics titles on
Amazon.com actually praised those books
which were light on 'painful' maths, and
then noting that the maths component in
geology degrees is relatively
undemanding. His worry was that 'the
volumes of data that are being acquired,
and will be acquired, in the future coupled
with the demands for higher individual
productivity dictate that we increase
automation of analysis . . . The success of
automation resides in the ability of an
individual to select an appropriate
algorithm(s) and accurately select the
parameter(s). Software can assist users in
the selection of parameters but cannot
replace the capabilities of a skilled user.'
Perhaps as a latecomer to realising the
value of a good education, Gibson is
passionate about the subject. He is a
supporter of the Houston-based Small
Steps Nurturing Center involving the
delivery of education to preschool children,
he's on an advisory board at Indiana
University, and is soon to be involved at his
alma mater Auburn University.
One thing that education can teach but
not guarantee in practice is ethical
business practice. Three years ago Gibson
made this point when delivering his
address as the inaugural AAPG
Distinguished Lecturer of Ethics. For
some, the role did not sit well given the
controversy that Halliburton has
sometimes attracted over its operations
around the world. Gibson's main point was
that we live in an era of poor
decision-making rather than poor ethics,
and even if evil people do exist in the
world they are not the main issue. He also
expressed concern about the short term
thinking to meet stockholder expectations
at the expense of health benefits, pensions
and the environment.
How Gibson finds the time to pursue all
his interests is something else. He likes to
say that he has a degree in attention
deficit, and he certainly is busy. Apart from
Fox Paine and Paradigm business, he is
also a board director of a telecoms
company in Alaska (which he visits from
time to time) and of Parker Drilling in
Houston. Gibson's agenda at any time
might also involve his wife and grown up
kids, their farm where animal rescue is a
specialty and currently has the odd zebra
on the property, his church, opera,
painting, the gun collection, and of course
the Valhalla Six Guns motorcycle group
(he rides a Honda Valkyrie).
Straight-shooter that he is, Gibson also
admits a fondness for hunting, and yes, he
has been out in the field with US vice
president Dick Cheney, former chairman
of Halliburton. But that, as they say, is
another story, and Gibson's target right
now is to raise the profile of Paradigm in
the E&P software business. OE
Click here to register to receive your own copy of Offshore Engineer each month.
|